|
Wednesday 12 December 2001
|
|
| More banana-labelling madness; this time a label on a banana suggested I should "Eat 5 a day!" Does crude advertising like that actually work? If my novel should be published, should I put a label on it; "Buy one every day"? Perhaps "Buy one for each of your friends"? It seems to work for ICQ spamming. Can't hurt to try it, I suppose. [16:31] [2 comments]
|
|
|
Tuesday 11 December 2001
|
| A terrible comedy idea that came to me while I was playing a game. Popular songs rephrased and sung in the idiosyncratic styles of recognisable characters. The example I thought of that made the idea sound entertaining was to reconstruct the song "War" out of quotes from Giles from Buffy. "War? Hm. My goodness, everyone! What is its purpose? Nothing, as far as I can see." Timed to match up with the original music, of course. Perhaps played on a kazoo. Speaking of which, the kazoo-and-Hawking version of "Smells Like Teen Spirit" from that site I mentioned yesterday is fantastic, in a grotesque sort of way. [23:06] [0 comments]
|
|
I just got my favourite spam again:
If you are a time traveler or alien disguised as human and or have
the technology to travel physically through time I need your help!
My life has been severely tampered with and cursed!!
I have suffered tremendously and am now dying!
I need to be able to:
Travel back in time.
Rewind my life including my age.
Be able to remember what I know now so that I can prevent my life from
being tampered with again after I go back.
I am in very great danger and need this immediately!
I am aware that there are many types of time travel and that humans do not
do well through certain types.
I need as close to temporal reversion as possible, as safely as possible.
To be able to rewind the hands of time in such a way that the universe of
now will cease to exist.
I know that there are some very powerful people out there with alien or
government equipment capable of doing just that.
If you can help me I will pay for your teleport or trip down here, Along
with hotel stay, food and all expenses. I will pay top dollar for the
equipment. Proof must be provided.
Only if you have this technology and can help me please send me a
(SEPARATE) email to:
(email address removed by RavenBlack so as to not support the spam)
Actually, I've been getting quite a bit of spam in this "your feedback form" format - not *my* feedback form, of course. The website(s) whose feedback form it actually is really need to secure it a bit. (This substitute for an open relay is very easy to find, and just as easy to exploit, sadly.) [22:46] [2 comments]
|
|
 [01:22] [1 comment]
| Also via Meander comes the Utterly Surreal Test. I am Benoit Mandelbrot Holding a Chicken. I redefine tables of pepper with my jocular slices of casino. Elevated plastic toes infuse my intestinal dichotomies with limp inkwells. My forgotten compass is enscribed by master carrots. Which prawn requires dough? [01:21] [2 comments]
| Meander, again, is the source of all Flash merriment. This time it's the abridged 2001. [00:48] [0 comments]
|
|
|
Monday 10 December 2001
|
| Today's lesson of novel-writing - accost someone from a mailing list, whose writing style you admire, and sneakily mention that you have just finished writing a novel, in some context that will intrigue them. Once they have taken the bait, let them read it on the condition that it is a proof-reading. They will turn out to be the finest proof-reader you could possibly have hoped for, worthy of heaping praise and compliments upon, and writing a praise-singing blog entry about. Praise them until they can take no more, then praise them some more anyway. Identity of my favourite proof-reader has been concealed to protect the innocent. [17:33] [0 comments]
|
|
Guns lesson one: changing any seemingly innocuous thing will change the behaviour of every other aspect of the gun. For example, removing the magazine, which I had expected to do nothing more than prevent any ammo being loaded. Instead, it had the additional effects of:- Preventing the slide from locking back, which thus surprised me with its springing back, caught my finger, wouldn't let go, required two hands to release when I only had one hand free, and was thus lots of fun.
- Preventing the trigger from affecting the hammer, which is probably good in that it would prevent one from firing a cartridge that's been forgotten in the chamber, but still, confusing when you're merely examining the mechanisms.
- Preventing any motion of the hammer at all. Similar to the trigger thing, really, but less weird.
My favourite unexpected behaviour, however, was that dismantling the gun cannot be performed with the safety on. Which seems terribly terribly wrong. I really don't want to fire the gun while it's in pieces, actually. [13:24] [1 comment]
|
|
|
Sunday 9 December 2001
|
| So, Spy Game was seen, and thus the track record of The Brunching Shuttlecocks' Self Made Critic is ruined. It wasn't bad, but it really wasn't anything special. Robert Wossname's character was good. The rest of the movie really wasn't. It lacked even the realism or continuity that might have made it a good movie that I wouldn't like, rather than the mediocre movie that I didn't like that it was. Not that I can remember the three major glitches I spotted. Ending sucked too. But at least it was seen in good company, which redeemed it. Unfortunately, the retard behind us who kept clapping at every scene re-ruined it. Ah well. [20:52] [0 comments]
|
|
|
Friday 7 December 2001
|
Hm, a bit of a dream. Yes, boring blog material I know, getting to be E/N, but perhaps E/N is better than just N. And it's at least a speculative part of a dream, rather than here is me gibbering my entire dream that doesn't even make any sense. Instead I gibber about how I'm not gibbering, thus filling up space, as though I still had a word count to fulfil. I can't get out of the padding habit, now that I've started. Oh the horror, the humanity.
As I was saying, the dream part. Someone was running away up a hill, and I was tired, too tired to chase. So I adopted a strange alternative chasing method, which was to lie down on my side, making sure my leather coat was between me and the ground, and then push along with my feet, as though I were on a whole-body-skateboard of some kind. This would be of less interest to me if I didn't recognise it from previous dreams. Why do I travel this way? It's similar, in a way, to childlike dreams of flight, in that normal physics doesn't seem to apply. [23:09] [6 comments]
|
|
| I am amused by the box of some mints. "Richardson After Dinner brand Pastel Mints". The word 'brand' is in a very small font, comparatively. As though it's something they have to include, for reasons of legality. But why? Were people suing? "I ate one of those mints, and it wasn't after dinner! I was relying on that mint making it be after dinner, damn you!" [13:34] [1 comment]
|
|
|
Thursday 6 December 2001
|
| Why is it that immediately before going food-shopping, when the fridge and freezer are completely empty and the cupboards aren't much better, it's easy to find stuff to eat, yet when you have both fridge and freezer stuffed full with food, it's not? Partially, it's a matter of selection - very easy to choose a food when you can only find one - but what makes everything unappealing when there are other options? Do we buy only food that isn't good? I don't think so. I like all the food we buy. Then why don't I want to eat any of it now, when I'm hungry? Grarh. [12:02] [5 comments]
|
|
|
Wednesday 5 December 2001
|
| Do you ever become irate while saving images as jpegs, not knowing what quality to choose, and having to faff around a lot to discern which is best? No? Well I did, which is why I just wrote 'Peg It - a bmp-to-jpeg converter with a proper preview of what the output will look like when decompressed again. It can also do interface-less conversion, or jpeg-ise an image from the clipboard, or accept dropped bmp files. I shall be using it regularly, so expect to see terrible grainy images due to my eyes not picking up on such things. [22:21] [1 comment]
|
|
If I were a work of art, I would be M.C. Escher's Lizards. I am a bizarre juxtaposition of the real and the unreal. Based in the realm of mathematics, my two dimensional appearance belies a complex and free-willed behaviour which both delights and confuses people. At least according to The Art Test. [11:31] [4 comments]
|
|
|
Tuesday 4 December 2001
|
| What do I replace the novel-pacer with now? Perhaps a PeGaProMo pacer? Maybe a PeAnMaMo pacer? Perhaps others would like to join me in animation making month, once I have my equipment? I'll probably declare it for March or so. [02:30] [0 comments]
| According to The Harry Potter Personality Test, I am, in order, most similar to Professor Alastor Moody, Professor Severus Snape, Professor Minerva McGonagall, Lord Voldemort, Sirius Black, Draco Malfoy, Hermione Granger, and then all the characters I didn't like. I am the best. [02:14] [2 comments]
| Fly or roll? I'll walk, thanks. It's cheaper, and I won't become Baron Harkonnen shaped. [02:09] [1 comment]
|
|
|
Monday 3 December 2001
|
| Tales of the Hair. Today I experimented with the fearful substances of "professional hair dye". Which is essentially the same as what you get in a kit, but not measured out for you. As a special bonus for buying professional hair dye, you get the right to sue if it goes wrong, and the right to feel heroic if it doesn't. I am a Professional. As it turns out, the dye (Framesi Framcolor 2001 Coloring Cream: Blue-black) wasn't as good as I had hoped. Not bad, mind - it's as good as the stuff I usually use and, per use, cheaper. The colour hasn't really come out blue-black though. It's mostly pure-black, and with something of a green undertone. Of course, this is possibly my fault, using a 20-vol developer rather than a lower one - 20-vol being supposed to be for same-darkness-level, and green, I suppose, being what one might end up with after using undarkened blue. Bear in mind the green isn't obvious at all - I doubt it would show up in a picture, or I'd show it. So, that's your lesson in professional hair dyes for the day. This is not to be construed as dye-usage advice - sue your seller, not me. Nor is that last sentence to be construed as legal advice - sue your lawyer, not me. And so on. [20:47] [13 comments]
|
|
| Agh! The irony! It burns! Is Your Son A Computer Hacker? Came to me in a dream, or via zx64, whichever is the greater. [17:05] [1 comment]
| I now arbitrarily blame Word 95 for the spread of strange spelling on the internet. "Alright" is not a word, you must replace it with "all right". At least according to Word and people in chat things. It irks me. Many things irk me. I am eminently irkable. [04:18] [1 comment]
|
|
| Speaking of corpses, I went to see the Harry Potter movie, whatever its title is, in tremendous violation of my usual movie-watching requirements. And a reasonably good thing too, because it was a passable movie. Part of the reason I went to see it was the opinion of the as yet unflawed Self Made Critic review, which means SMC retains its high reliability rating. At least until some time next week when I see Spy Game. I really don't have anything bad to say about Potter, except what SMC already said. Even the child actors don't suck, mostly. And as I always say, if you don't have anything mean and nasty to say, don't say anything at all. Except that sentence, and the rest of this blog entry. And other things. [02:17] [0 comments]
| What's this? Another new Corpse? It is, and a bloody nice one too. [02:00] [1 comment]
|  [01:59] [1 comment]
|
|
|
Sunday 2 December 2001
|
| Another of those tests, alas. But I don't use their code! I don't use their picture! I simply tell you that I am Wormtongue according to the Lord of the Rings character test, which is indeed the most pleasing option given that there was no Sauron or Ring-wraiths available. Not use the ring to be a super monster beasty? Are you mad? [19:41] [0 comments]
| A chap a while back randomly sent me some pictures of some nice raven art. There were more, but these were my favourites. [03:04] [0 comments]
|
|
|
Saturday 1 December 2001
|
| I immediately proceed to prove myself wrong by being Imelda Marcos. [18:04] [2 comments]
| I always get the best possible result on these tests. I am Francisco Scaramanga. [18:00] [0 comments]
| Via my mother, oddly, comes the rather nicely done happypencil.com. Sadly not (yet) worth visiting without a broadband connection. [13:34] [1 comment]
| A question for my readers - be honest - who thought (some time in the last four days), that I was not going to complete the novel? (I won't be offended - I would have thought so myself, if I weren't the one in control. Indeed, that was a part of the motivation, my old favourite, proving people wrong.) [11:58] [3 comments]
|
|
|