| RavenBlog |
|
| Comments on Thursday 15 May 2008: |
| I was just looking at some legal cases for some uninteresting reason, and was amused by the names of some of them; particularly "Equity and Law vs (someone)". Equity and Law is a building society or something, but its name gets reduced to that for case-naming purposes. Also "(someone) vs Pears". So I was thinking how enjoyably foregone-conclusion it sounds if you have a case like "Equity and Law vs Pears", and thus, that if you expect your company to ever have a legal problem, you should name it something dramatically favourable at its inception. "The Forces of Good vs McDonalds." "Justice and Freedom vs Jones." "All That Is Good And Holy vs Does It Matter?" Though "The Forces of Darkness versus Pears" might work too. [22:14] |
| Anet |
| The Forces of Good vs Actual Good Case lost on rebuttal... |